UK prosecutors have alleged that former Nigerian oil minister Diezani Alison‑Madueke spent approximately £2m at Harrods, presenting the claim as evidence of how funds linked to corruption were allegedly used during the period under investigation.
The allegation was outlined during proceedings at a London court, where prosecutors are seeking to establish that money passing through accounts associated with Alison-Madueke was derived from criminal conduct and later deployed on high-value purchases in the United Kingdom.
Luxury Spending Placed Before the Court
According to prosecutors, transaction records presented to the court show repeated high-value purchases over several years, which they argue are inconsistent with legitimate income streams available to the former minister at the time.
The prosecution says the alleged spending pattern forms part of a broader evidentiary trail linking suspected proceeds of corruption to lifestyle expenditures, an approach commonly used in asset-recovery and forfeiture cases.
What Prosecutors Are Trying to Prove
The UK case centres on whether funds that moved through offshore and UK-based accounts can be traced to corrupt activity connected to Alison-Madueke’s time in office. Prosecutors argue that demonstrating how the money was spent helps establish both control over the funds and knowledge of their source.
They have emphasised that the court is not being asked to rule on taste or personal consumption, but on whether the money used was lawfully acquired.
Defence Position and Legal Context
Alison-Madueke has consistently denied wrongdoing. Her legal team maintains that the funds in question were legitimately earned and that the prosecution’s case relies on inference rather than direct proof of corruption.
Under UK law, prosecutors must show on the balance of probabilities that assets targeted for forfeiture are linked to criminal conduct. The court will weigh financial records, witness testimony and documentary evidence before reaching a decision.
Why the Case Matters
The proceedings are being closely watched in Nigeria and abroad because they intersect with long-running efforts to recover assets allegedly linked to corruption by public officials. UK courts have become a key venue for such cases, given the scale of financial flows through London’s banking and property markets.
Legal analysts note that outcomes in cases like this can influence future cooperation between jurisdictions on asset tracing, forfeiture and repatriation.
What Happens Next
The trial is expected to continue with further examination of financial records and witness evidence. The court will later determine whether prosecutors have met the legal threshold required to sustain their claims.
Until then, the allegations remain unproven, and Alison-Madueke continues to be presumed innocent under the law.
This is IDNN. Independent. Digital. Uncompromising.
