Nnamdi Kanu’s Terrorism Trial Stalled as He Rejects Judge’s Authority

Abuja, Nigeria – The trial of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), facing alleged terrorism charges, has been adjourned indefinitely by Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court in Abuja. This dramatic development occurred after Kanu vehemently protested Justice Nyako’s continued involvement in the case, citing her previous recusal.

Key Takeaways:

• Trial Adjourned Indefinitely: Justice Binta Nyako adjourned Nnamdi Kanu’s trial sine die due to Kanu’s objection.

• Jurisdiction Challenged: Nnamdi Kanu declared he does not recognize the court’s authority under Justice Nyako, insisting she had recused herself.

• Terrorism Charges: Kanu remains in DSS custody facing severe charges including terrorism and treasonable felony.

• IPOB Spotlight: The case continues to draw attention to IPOB and the group’s activities.

Contentious Court Session
The adjournment came after a fiery exchange in court, where Nnamdi Kanu insisted Justice Nyako had no jurisdiction to preside over his trial. He argued that her earlier recusal in September remained valid, despite the Chief Judge’s decision to return the case file to her.
Kanu, who has been in DSS custody since his 2021 arrest, stated he was only present out of respect for the court but firmly rejected Justice Nyako’s authority.

He further exclaimed, “You cannot preside over this case, not now, not today, not ever… You are biased!”.

Kanu’s Defiant Words
Reports detail Kanu directly confronting the judge, declaring the court a “shrine to injustice” and stating he would not subject himself to its proceedings. He further exclaimed, “You cannot preside over this case, not now, not today, not ever… You are biased!”.

Legal Wrangling and Reactions
The prosecution, led by Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), requested the court to fix a trial date, but Kanu’s lawyer, Mr. Alloy Ejimakor, maintained that Justice Nyako’s recusal was still in effect. This led to a debate over whether a formal motion was required for her to step down.
Justice Nyako explained that the Chief Judge had directed Kanu to file a formal motion requesting reassignment of the case. However, Kanu refused, leading to the indefinite adjournment.

Background: Charges and Circumstances
Nnamdi Kanu faces charges including terrorism, treasonable felony, managing an unlawful society, and illegal possession of firearms. He was initially granted bail in 2017 but fled the country after a military raid on his home. His bail was revoked, and he was rearrested and brought back to Nigeria.

What’s Next?
The indefinite adjournment leaves the future of Nnamdi Kanu’s trial uncertain. The situation raises questions about the handling of the case and its broader implications for IPOB, Nigerian politics, and the judicial process.
DGR8Z.com will continue to provide updates on this developing story.