A line the law draws clearly
Lawyers have reiterated that Nigerian public servants are prohibited from accepting gifts or benefits that could influence, or appear to influence, the discharge of official duties. The warning follows recent court filings in which a former senior government official listed substantial sums received as “traditional gifts” while in office.
According to legal practitioners, existing statutes and constitutional provisions are explicit in restricting public officers from receiving personal benefits connected to their official roles.
Where ethics meet the criminal code
Former NBA Garki Branch chairman Obioma Ezenwobodo said the law is designed to prevent conflicts of interest and abuse of office.
“There are laws against a public officer receiving gifts to dispense favour or that amount to conflict of interest,” he said, noting that prosecutors only need to establish a link between the gift and official conduct to sustain corruption charges.
Another lawyer, Nnamdi Ahaaiwe, explained that Nigeria’s Code of Conduct for Public Officers prohibits accepting any benefit “on account of anything done or omitted” in the course of official duties, except for limited personal gifts recognised by custom.
When ‘gifts’ become evidence
Legal analysts say gifts received from individuals or entities with dealings before government are presumed unlawful unless proven otherwise. They add that even ceremonial gifts are legally treated as gifts to the institution, not the individual officer.
Under anti-corruption laws, accepting gratification — broadly defined to include money, property, donations, or advantages — can attract prison sentences if linked to influence, favour, or abuse of office.
Why this clarification matters now
The renewed debate comes amid heightened public scrutiny of asset declarations, forfeiture proceedings, and lifestyle disclosures by former public officials. As courts increasingly interrogate the sources of wealth accumulated during public service, claims framed as “gifts” are being tested against stricter legal interpretation.
Civil society groups argue that ambiguity around gifts has long enabled corruption to masquerade as tradition or generosity.
What accountability will hinge on
Transparency advocates insist that clearer enforcement, not new laws, is what Nigeria needs. If courts uphold strict interpretation of existing statutes, public officers may face tighter scrutiny over personal enrichment while in service.
If enforcement remains selective, critics warn, the gap between ethical rules and lived reality will continue to undermine trust in public institutions.
This is IDNN. Independent. Digital. Uncompromising.
